New York Life Ins. Co. v. Reese

79 So. 245, 201 Ala. 673, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 198
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 18, 1918·No. 3 Div. 331.·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

SOMERVILLE, J.

The sole question -in this case is whether plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount equal to- the face of the policy and one-half of the premiums paid, as for the death of the insured within the specified term of insurance, or whether he can recover only the amount of the cash surrender value of the policy, as for the optional benefit chosen by the insured just before his death, and payable to him on November 16, 1916, if he was living on that date.

The policy is in the form of what is known as tontine insurance, and by its express terms the death benefits here claimed are payable only if the death of the insured shall occur before the 16th day of November, 1916, or if, at the end of the tontine or accumulation period, the policy has been continued in force by -the insured’s election of one of the first three options provided. Otherwise, his benefits are limited to options 4, 5, or 6, as he may have elected. On October 27, 1916, the *674 insured elected to discontinue the policy and receive the cash benefits provided under the fifth option, and was duly notified that the amount due thereunder would be paid to him on November 16th. He died at 4 o’clock a. m. on the day designated, of course without having received the payment due.

[1] We think that a fair interpretation of all the provisions of the policy leads to the clear conclusion that the original insurance period, and, with it, the tontine period, expired on the first moment of November 16, 1916, and that the death of the insured occurred after the elected benefit had become operative in lieu of the death benefit which was limited ,to the tontine period. It results that the judgment of the trial court was erroneous, and must be reversed. Let a judgment be here entered for plaintiff for $562.74, with interest from November 16, 1916.

Reversed and rendered.

ANDERSON, O. J., and MAYFIELD and GARDNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Reese, 79 So. 245, 201 Ala. 673, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 198 (Ala. 1918).

79 So. 245 (New York Life Ins. Co. v. Reese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moody v. State Ex Rel. Payne
355 So. 2d 1116 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1978)
Chapman v. Rivers Construction Company
227 So. 2d 403 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1969)
Snellings v. Builders' Supply Co.
155 So. 858 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1934)
Campbell v. Tucker
154 So. 821 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1933)
Ashley v. Hill
110 So. 597 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926)
Montgomery Light Water Power Co. v. Thombs
87 So. 205 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)