New York Kappa Tau of Pi Lambda Phi, Inc. v. Grosberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

New York Kappa Tau of Pi Lambda Phi, Inc. v. Grosberg

30 A.D.2d 888, 291 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3492

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 8, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 888 (New York Kappa Tau of Pi Lambda Phi, Inc. v. Grosberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York Kappa Tau of Pi Lambda Phi, Inc. v. Grosberg, 30 A.D.2d 888, 291 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3492 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court.

Appeal from a judgment of 'Special Term annulling a determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals and directing the issuance of a special use permit. As found by Special Term, the record does not contain substantial evidence to support the determination of the board and, accordingly, its refusal to issue the permit was unreasonable and arbitrary. The other contentions of the appellants are without merit. (Matter of Lemir Realty Corp. v. Larkin, 11 N Y 2d 20; Matter of Shell Creek Sailing Club v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 20 N Y 2d 841; Matter of Barry v. O’Connell, 303 N. Y. 46.) Judgment modified to the extent of remitting the matter to respondent Board of Zoning Appeals for the purpose of authorizing the issuance of a special use permit upon proper -conditions as the board deems reasonable and necessary (see Matter of Grand Chapter of Phi Sigma Kappa v. Grosberg, 30 A D 2d 887), and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court.

Appeal from a judgment of 'Special Term annulling a determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals and directing the issuance of a special use permit. As found by Special Term, the record does not contain substantial evidence to support the determination of the board and, accordingly, its refusal to issue the permit was unreasonable and arbitrary. The other contentions of the appellants are without merit. (Matter of Lemir Realty Corp. v. Larkin, 11 N Y 2d 20; Matter of Shell Creek Sailing Club v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 20 N Y 2d 841; Matter of Barry v. O’Connell, 303 N. Y. 46.) Judgment modified to the extent of remitting the matter to respondent Board of Zoning Appeals for the purpose of authorizing the issuance of a special use permit upon proper -conditions as the board deems reasonable and necessary (see Matter of Grand Chapter of Phi Sigma Kappa v. Grosberg, 30 A D 2d 887), and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 888, 291 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-kappa-tau-of-pi-lambda-phi-inc-v-grosberg-nyappdiv-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack