New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens v. Clarendon National Insurance
This text of 13 A.D.3d 596 (New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens v. Clarendon National Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover no-fault benefits, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated February 10, 2004, as granted the defendant’s motion, to vacate a judgment of the same court entered July 11, 2003, upon its failure to appear or answer the complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is denied, and the judgment is reinstated.
It is well settled that a defendant seeking to vacate a default in appearing or answering a complaint must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and the existence of a meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Glibbery v Cosenza & Assoc., 4 AD3d 393 [2004]; Kaplinsky v Mazor, 307 AD2d 916 [2003]). The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment since the defendant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its default. Ritter, J.P., H. Miller, Schmidt, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 A.D.3d 596, 786 N.Y.S.2d 352, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-hospital-medical-center-of-queens-v-clarendon-national-insurance-nyappdiv-2004.