New York Hanseatic Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

New York Hanseatic Corp. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 510

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 27, 1959

DocketReap. Dec. 9331; Entry No. A-15

StatusPublished

This text of 42 Cust. Ct. 510 (New York Hanseatic Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York Hanseatic Corp. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 510 (cusc 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain sodium trichloracetate exported from West Germany and entered at the port of Hilo, T.H.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of this merchandise is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is $330.84 per 1,000 kilos, plus cost of packing and labor in packing, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain sodium trichloracetate exported from West Germany and entered at the port of Hilo, T.H.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of this merchandise is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is $330.84 per 1,000 kilos, plus cost of packing and labor in packing, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 Cust. Ct. 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-hanseatic-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1959.