New York Hanseatic Corp. P. W. Bellingall, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

New York Hanseatic Corp. P. W. Bellingall, Inc. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 670

United States Customs Court·Decided June 9, 1959·No. Reap. Dec. 9451; Entry Nos. 15197; 25868; 28417·Published

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain sodium trichloracetate exported from Western Germany and entered at the port of San Francisco, Calif.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the sodium trichloracetate in question, which is represented by the invoice items marked “A,” is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for the merchandise is $330.84 per 1,000 kilos, plus cost of packing and labor in packing, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain sodium trichloracetate exported from Western Germany and entered at the port of San Francisco, Calif.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the sodium trichloracetate in question, which is represented by the invoice items marked “A,” is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for the merchandise is $330.84 per 1,000 kilos, plus cost of packing and labor in packing, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

New York Hanseatic Corp. P. W. Bellingall, Inc. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 670 (cusc 1959).

Pincite

42 Cust. Ct. 670 (New York Hanseatic Corp. P. W. Bellingall, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.