New York ex rel. Retsof Mining Co. v. Graves

308 U.S. 503, 60 S. Ct. 87
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 9, 1939·No. No. 143·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Without passing on the question whether the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals was properly invoked by application for leave to appeal to that court, the motion to dismiss the appeal to this Court is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. And[504]*504erson v. Forty-Two Broadway Co., 239 U. S. 69, 72-73; Denman v. Slayton, 282 U. S. 514, 519-520.

Mr. Henry B. Twombly for. appellant. Messrs. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney General of New York, and Wendell P. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New York ex rel. Retsof Mining Co. v. Graves, 308 U.S. 503, 60 S. Ct. 87 (1939).

308 U.S. 503 (New York ex rel. Retsof Mining Co. v. Graves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. Forty-Two Broadway Co.
239 U.S. 69 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Denman v. Slayton
282 U.S. 514 (Supreme Court, 1931)