New York ex rel. Retsof Mining Co. v. Graves

308 U.S. 503, 60 S. Ct. 87
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 9, 1939
DocketNo. 143
StatusPublished

This text of 308 U.S. 503 (New York ex rel. Retsof Mining Co. v. Graves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York ex rel. Retsof Mining Co. v. Graves, 308 U.S. 503, 60 S. Ct. 87 (1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Without passing on the question whether the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals was properly invoked by application for leave to appeal to that court, the motion to dismiss the appeal to this Court is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. And[504]*504erson v. Forty-Two Broadway Co., 239 U. S. 69, 72-73; Denman v. Slayton, 282 U. S. 514, 519-520.

Mr. Henry B. Twombly for. appellant. Messrs. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney General of New York, and Wendell P. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. Forty-Two Broadway Co.
239 U.S. 69 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Denman v. Slayton
282 U.S. 514 (Supreme Court, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
308 U.S. 503, 60 S. Ct. 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-ex-rel-retsof-mining-co-v-graves-scotus-1939.