New York Electric Lines Co. v. Gaynor

242 U.S. 617, 37 S. Ct. 212
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 11, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 242 U.S. 617 (New York Electric Lines Co. v. Gaynor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York Electric Lines Co. v. Gaynor, 242 U.S. 617, 37 S. Ct. 212 (1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error prayed for is denied upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Holden Land Co. v. Interstate Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; Mellon Co. v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Ry. Co. v. Adams, 180 U. S. 26; Beals v. Cone, 188 U. S. 184; Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U. S. 672; (3) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380, 382. See New York Electric Lines Co. v. Empire City Subway Co., 235 U. S. 179. Mr. Alexander S. Bacon for the petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown
187 U.S. 308 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Beals v. Cone
188 U.S. 184 (Supreme Court, 1903)
Leathe v. Thomas
207 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Wood v. Chesborough
228 U.S. 672 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce
235 U.S. 380 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Mellon Co. v. McCafferty
239 U.S. 134 (Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 U.S. 617, 37 S. Ct. 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-electric-lines-co-v-gaynor-scotus-1916.