New York Dock Co. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

New York Dock Co. v. City of New York

248 A.D. 783

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 783 (New York Dock Co. v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York Dock Co. v. City of New York, 248 A.D. 783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

The action is brought by the plaintiff to recover of defendant The City of New York under an indemnity agreement contained in a deed made by plaintiff to the city, of certain easements, temporary and permanent respectively, required for the construction of subway tubes under the property of the plaintiff; in which action defendants Mason & Hanger Company, Inc., and Silas Mason Company, contractors with the city of New York for the building of the subway, were made parties defendant at the instance of defendant The City of New York. Judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the city of New York unanimous^ affirmed, with costs. Order denying motions [784]*784to vacate the judgment and -for a new trial unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The action is brought by the plaintiff to recover of defendant The City of New York under an indemnity agreement contained in a deed made by plaintiff to the city, of certain easements, temporary and permanent respectively, required for the construction of subway tubes under the property of the plaintiff; in which action defendants Mason & Hanger Company, Inc., and Silas Mason Company, contractors with the city of New York for the building of the subway, were made parties defendant at the instance of defendant The City of New York. Judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the city of New York unanimous^ affirmed, with costs. Order denying motions [784]*784to vacate the judgment and -for a new trial unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-dock-co-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1936.