New York Consolidated Railroad v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
194 A.D. 917
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in New York Consolidated Railroad v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance. Read the opinion of the Court — 193 A.D. 438 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1920·Published
Opinion
As it may be considered that the exception to the refusal to dismiss the second cause of action, at folio 170 of the case, sufficiently raises the question of law as to plaintiff’s right to recover for the tort, we grant the motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Present — Jenks, P. J., Rich, Putnam, Blaekmar and Kelly, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New York Consolidated Railroad v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance, 194 A.D. 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).
194 A.D. 917 (New York Consolidated Railroad v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.