New York Community Bank v. Dorsey

Missouri Court of Appeals

New York Community Bank v. Dorsey

413 S.W.3d 676, 2013 WL 5940047, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1313

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 5, 2013·No. No. WD 76230·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Joyce Dorsey, acting pro se, appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County in favor of New York Community Bank (“NYCB”) in an action filed by NYCB to quiet title to Lot 24 of Oldham’s 1st Addition subdivision in Kansas City, Missouri. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the trial court properly entered summary judgment as there is no genuine issue of material fact and NYCB was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Joyce Dorsey, acting pro se, appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County in favor of New York Community Bank (“NYCB”) in an action filed by NYCB to quiet title to Lot 24 of Oldham’s 1st Addition subdivision in Kansas City, Missouri. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the trial court properly entered summary judgment as there is no genuine issue of material fact and NYCB was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

New York Community Bank v. Dorsey, 413 S.W.3d 676, 2013 WL 5940047, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1313 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

413 S.W.3d 676 (New York Community Bank v. Dorsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.