New York Coffee Polishing Co. v. Wilson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York

New York Coffee Polishing Co. v. Wilson

2 F. 904, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2514

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York

DecidedJune 11, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 2 F. 904 (New York Coffee Polishing Co. v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York Coffee Polishing Co. v. Wilson, 2 F. 904, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2514 (circtedny 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Benedict, D. J.

This is an action brought by the assignee of a patent for an improvement in cleaning and polishing coffee, which patent was issued to WilliamThompsonandSamuel Thompson, on January 31, 1871, numbered 111,403. Upon the trial the plaintiff abandoned the first claim of tha patent and relies only upon the second claim.

[905]*905In regard to the second claim, the defendant did not at the •trial undertake to dispute his liability, or to deny the plaintiff’s right to a decree. Under such circumstances I discover no reason why, in this case, a decree should not go against the defendant for an infringement of the second claim of the patent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benedict, D. J.

This is an action brought by the assignee of a patent for an improvement in cleaning and polishing coffee, which patent was issued to WilliamThompsonandSamuel Thompson, on January 31, 1871, numbered 111,403. Upon the trial the plaintiff abandoned the first claim of tha patent and relies only upon the second claim.

[905]*905In regard to the second claim, the defendant did not at the •trial undertake to dispute his liability, or to deny the plaintiff’s right to a decree. Under such circumstances I discover no reason why, in this case, a decree should not go against the defendant for an infringement of the second claim of the patent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 F. 904, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-coffee-polishing-co-v-wilson-circtedny-1880.