New York Civil Liberties Union v. New York City Police Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

New York Civil Liberties Union v. New York City Police Department

74 A.D.3d 632, 902 N.Y.S.2d 356

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 22, 2010·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered December 28, 2009, granting the petition and directing respondents to produce data requested under the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioners seek information identifying the race of persons shot at but not hit by NYPD officers between 1997 and 2006, either in the form of redacted individual reports, or—as respondents have already disclosed with respect to persons shot at and hit—in tabular form. By already having voluntarily and deliberately disclosed one category of information relating to persons shot, respondents affirmatively waived their right to claim FOIL exemptions in the requested data (see Matter of Molloy v New York City Police Dept., 50 AD3d 98, 100 [2008]). Even were we to find that there was no waiver, the record nonetheless demonstrates that the reports can be redacted to adequately protect their confidential nature (see Matter of Data Tree, LLC v Romaine, 9 NY3d 454, 464 [2007]; Daily Gazette Co. v City of Schenectady, 93 NY2d 145 [1999]). Concur— Gonzalez, P.J., Andrias, Catterson, Renwick and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered December 28, 2009, granting the petition and directing respondents to produce data requested under the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioners seek information identifying the race of persons shot at but not hit by NYPD officers between 1997 and 2006, either in the form of redacted individual reports, or—as respondents have already disclosed with respect to persons shot at and hit—in tabular form. By already having voluntarily and deliberately disclosed one category of information relating to persons shot, respondents affirmatively waived their right to claim FOIL exemptions in the requested data (see Matter of Molloy v New York City Police Dept., 50 AD3d 98, 100 [2008]). Even were we to find that there was no waiver, the record nonetheless demonstrates that the reports can be redacted to adequately protect their confidential nature (see Matter of Data Tree, LLC v Romaine, 9 NY3d 454, 464 [2007]; Daily Gazette Co. v City of Schenectady, 93 NY2d 145 [1999]). Concur— Gonzalez, P.J., Andrias, Catterson, Renwick and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.

New York Civil Liberties Union v. New York City Police Department, 74 A.D.3d 632, 902 N.Y.S.2d 356 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

74 A.D.3d 632 (New York Civil Liberties Union v. New York City Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related