New York City Transit Authority v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

New York City Transit Authority v. Williams

36 A.D.3d 706, 826 N.Y.S.2d 580

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 16, 2007·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated September 22, 2005, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, and the arbitration is permanently stayed.

In view of the release signed by the respondent, the Supreme Court should have granted the petition to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits. Miller, J.E, Spolzino, Krausman, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated September 22, 2005, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, and the arbitration is permanently stayed.

In view of the release signed by the respondent, the Supreme Court should have granted the petition to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits. Miller, J.E, Spolzino, Krausman, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.

New York City Transit Authority v. Williams, 36 A.D.3d 706, 826 N.Y.S.2d 580 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

36 A.D.3d 706 (New York City Transit Authority v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related