New York City Omnibus Corporation v. Quill
78 N.E.2d 859, 297 N.Y. 832, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 941
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Lottghran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Ftjld, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New York City Omnibus Corporation v. Quill, 78 N.E.2d 859, 297 N.Y. 832, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 941 (N.Y. 1948).
78 N.E.2d 859 (New York City Omnibus Corporation v. Quill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pine Street Associates, L.P. v. Southridge Partners, L.P.
107 A.D.3d 95 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Sperry International Trade, Inc. v. Government of Israel
602 F. Supp. 1440 (S.D. New York, 1985)
Rose City Transit Co. v. City of Portland
525 P.2d 1325 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1974)
Upholsterers' International Union of North America v. American Pad & Textile Co.
372 F.2d 427 (Sixth Circuit, 1967)
Upholsterers' International Union Of North America, Afl-Cio v. The American Pad & Textile Company
372 F.2d 427 (Sixth Circuit, 1967)
Zdanok v. Glidden Co.
216 F. Supp. 476 (S.D. New York, 1963)