New York City Omnibus Corp. v. Quill

272 A.D.2d 1015

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1015 (New York City Omnibus Corp. v. Quill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York City Omnibus Corp. v. Quill, 272 A.D.2d 1015 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Opinion

Judgment as resettled in all respects unanimously affirmed, with costs, save that the words “in accordance with ” be substituted for the words “ and containing all the terms and provisions of said Third Avenue Transit Plan except as expressly modified by ” in paragraph (2) of the resettled judgment, and that the words “in accordance with” be substituted for the words “which shall contain all the terms and provisions of said Third Avenue Transit Plan except as expressly modified by” in the final paragraph of said resettled judgment. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [189 Misc. 892.] [273 App. Div. 759.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York City Omnibus Corp. v. Quill
189 Misc. 892 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 1015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-city-omnibus-corp-v-quill-nyappdiv-1947.