New York City Omnibus Corp. v. Quill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

New York City Omnibus Corp. v. Quill

272 A.D.2d 1015

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 31, 1947·Published

Opinion

Judgment as resettled in all respects unanimously affirmed, with costs, save that the words “in accordance with ” be substituted for the words “ and containing all the terms and provisions of said Third Avenue Transit Plan except as expressly modified by ” in paragraph (2) of the resettled judgment, and that the words “in accordance with” be substituted for the words “which shall contain all the terms and provisions of said Third Avenue Transit Plan except as expressly modified by” in the final paragraph of said resettled judgment. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [189 Misc. 892.] [273 App. Div. 759.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment as resettled in all respects unanimously affirmed, with costs, save that the words “in accordance with ” be substituted for the words “ and containing all the terms and provisions of said Third Avenue Transit Plan except as expressly modified by ” in paragraph (2) of the resettled judgment, and that the words “in accordance with” be substituted for the words “which shall contain all the terms and provisions of said Third Avenue Transit Plan except as expressly modified by” in the final paragraph of said resettled judgment. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [189 Misc. 892.] [273 App. Div. 759.]

New York City Omnibus Corp. v. Quill, 272 A.D.2d 1015 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

272 A.D.2d 1015 (New York City Omnibus Corp. v. Quill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related