New York City Economic Development Corp. v. T.C. Foods Import & Export Co.

46 A.D.3d 778, 847 N.Y.S.2d 669

This text of 46 A.D.3d 778 (New York City Economic Development Corp. v. T.C. Foods Import & Export Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York City Economic Development Corp. v. T.C. Foods Import & Export Co., 46 A.D.3d 778, 847 N.Y.S.2d 669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a restrictive covenant, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), entered May 26, 2006, as after, inter alia, a nonjury trial on the issue of damages, granted the motion of the defendants Marathon Outdoor, LLC, PNE Media, LLC, and Titan Outdoor Holdings, LLC, and Outdoor Concepts, LLC, doing business as Titan Outdoor, to dismiss the complaint in its entirety, and denied the plaintiffs motion for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant T.C. Foods Import and Export Co., Inc.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The measure of damages for breach of a restrictive covenant is the diminution in the value of the benefited parcel by reason of the breach (see Flynn v New York, Westchester & Boston Ry. Co., 218 NY 140 [1916]; Binghamton Plaza v Gilinsky, 32 AD2d 994 [1969]). Since the plaintiff did not adduce any evidence at trial as to such diminution, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendants Marathon Outdoors, LLC, PNE Media, LLC, and Titan Outdoor Holdings, LLC, and Outdoor Concepts, LLC, doing business as Titan Outdoor, to dismiss the complaint in its entirety.

The plaintiffs remaining contention is without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Dickerson, JJ., concur. [See 11 Misc 3d 1087(A), 2006 NY Slip Op 50754(H).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flynn v. New York, Westchester & Boston Railway Co.
112 N.E. 912 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)
Binghamton Plaza, Inc. v. Gilinsky
32 A.D.2d 994 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 A.D.3d 778, 847 N.Y.S.2d 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-city-economic-development-corp-v-tc-foods-import-export-co-nyappdiv-2007.