New-York Chemical Co. v. Flowers

6 Paige Ch. 654
New York Court of Chancery·Decided August 1, 1837·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The Chancellor

decided that a joint answer of the husband and wife must be sworn to by both, unless the complainant consents to receive the answer of both upon the oath of the husband only. And that in this case, as the answer was probably put in merely for delay, the husband not pretending that he had any valid defence, the answer must be taken off the files, and an order to take the bill as confessed must be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New-York Chemical Co. v. Flowers, 6 Paige Ch. 654 (N.Y. 1837).

6 Paige Ch. 654 (New-York Chemical Co. v. Flowers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey Washing Machine Co. v. Young
2 F. Cas. 390 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1874)
Harley v. Ritter
9 Abb. Pr. 400 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1859)