New York Central Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

New York Central Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

163 Ohio St. (N.S.) 250

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 27, 1955·No. No. 34186·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court will not substitute its judgment for that of the commission on questions of fact. It does not appear from an examination of the record that the order of the commission is unlawful or unreasonable. The order is, therefore, affirmed. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 156 Ohio St., 282, 102 N. E. (2d), 246.

Order affirmed.

Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell and Taet, JJ., concur. Weygandt, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This court will not substitute its judgment for that of the commission on questions of fact. It does not appear from an examination of the record that the order of the commission is unlawful or unreasonable. The order is, therefore, affirmed. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 156 Ohio St., 282, 102 N. E. (2d), 246.

Order affirmed.

Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell and Taet, JJ., concur. Weygandt, C. J., not participating.

New York Central Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 163 Ohio St. (N.S.) 250 (Ohio 1955).

Pincite

163 Ohio St. (N.S.) 250 (New York Central Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.