New York Central Railroad v. United States

Court of Claims

New York Central Railroad v. United States

124 Ct. Cl. 324, 1953 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 82

United States Court of Claims·Decided February 3, 1953·No. Nos. 49087, 49163, 49348 and 49708·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The pleadings and the issue here presented are identical with those in Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 467. For the reasons stated in that opinion plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment, to the extent that they ask for an adjudication that the jeeps involved in this action should be classified and rated as passenger motor vehicles, are granted.

Entry of judgment is suspended pending the filing of a report by the General Accounting Office and the disposition of the issues relating to the proper amount to be paid to plaintiff for the transportation services involved.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

The pleadings and the issue here presented are identical with those in Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 467. For the reasons stated in that opinion plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment, to the extent that they ask for an adjudication that the jeeps involved in this action should be classified and rated as passenger motor vehicles, are granted.

Entry of judgment is suspended pending the filing of a report by the General Accounting Office and the disposition of the issues relating to the proper amount to be paid to plaintiff for the transportation services involved.

It is so ordered.

New York Central Railroad v. United States, 124 Ct. Cl. 324, 1953 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 82 (cc 1953).

Pincite

124 Ct. Cl. 324 (New York Central Railroad v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related