New York Central Railroad v. Pender
101 N.E.2d 762, 303 N.Y. 651, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 1079
Opinion
Judgments reversed and judgment directed in favor of plaintiffs as demanded in the complaint, without costs. We construe the words “ the authority having jurisdiction ”, in subdivision 17 of section 14 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, to mean public officers or bodies only and not to include railroad companies over whose tracks there are maintained bridges carrying public highways. No opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New York Central Railroad v. Pender, 101 N.E.2d 762, 303 N.Y. 651, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 1079 (N.Y. 1951).
101 N.E.2d 762 (New York Central Railroad v. Pender) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Akers Motor Lines, Inc. v. City of New York
72 Misc. 2d 751 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1972)
People v. Rodenbach
204 Misc. 905 (New York County Courts, 1953)