New York Central Railroad v. First National Bank
193 A.D. 926
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Kruse, P. J., who dissents upon the ground that the power was a general power of sale for distribution and payment of debts and that the lien of the judgment is subject to the execution of the power as is provided in section 97 of the Real Property Law. (M’Cready v.. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 83 Hun, 526; affd., 148 N. Y. 761; Walter v. Tomkins, 71 App. Div. 21; Van Cott v. Van Cott, 167 id. 694.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New York Central Railroad v. First National Bank, 193 A.D. 926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).
193 A.D. 926 (New York Central Railroad v. First National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
M'cready v. . Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
43 N.E. 988 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)
Walter v. Tomkins
71 A.D. 21 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
McCready v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
32 N.Y.S. 489 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)