New York Central R. Co. v. United States
This text of 388 U.S. 445 (New York Central R. Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
John A. Daily for appellant.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Robert S. Burk for the United States et al., and Peter T. Beardsley, Harry J. Jordan, William R. Rubbert, R. Edwin Brady, Bryce Rea, Jr., James E. Wilson, Guy H. Postell, Ferdinand Born, LeGrand A. Carlston, F. H. Lynch, Jr., Roland Rice, Homer S. Carpenter, John S. Fessenden and Richard R. Sigmon for the American Trucking Associations, Inc., et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of American Trucking Associations, Inc., et al., to be added as parties appellee is granted.
The motion to affirm is granted and those portions of the judgment of the District Court from which appellant is appealing are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
388 U.S. 445, 87 S. Ct. 2094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-central-r-co-v-united-states-scotus-1967.