New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. Serpico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. Serpico

45 A.D.3d 598, 845 N.Y.S.2d 811

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 7, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 45 A.D.3d 598 (New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. Serpico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. Serpico, 45 A.D.3d 598, 845 N.Y.S.2d 811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 75 to temporarily stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim to allow for discovery in aid of arbitration, the petitioner appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated May 22, 2006, which, inter alia, denied that branch of its motion which was to direct the respondent to provide all medical authorizations for the medical records and reports relative to the subject accident and two prior automobile accidents.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the petitioner’s motion which was to direct the respondent to provide all medical authorizations for the medical records and reports relating to the subject accident and two prior automobile accidents and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the appellant.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the petitioner’s motion which was to direct the respondent to provide all medical authorizations to obtain relevant medical reports and copies of relevant medical records pertaining to those bodily injuries that the respondent claims to have sustained as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident, including medical reports and medical records pertaining to bodily injuries sustained before the subject accident occurred which were similar to those allegedly sustained in the [599]*599subject accident (see CPLR 3102 [c]; Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Bautista, 11 AD3d 471 [2004]; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Moya, 288 AD2d 309 [2001]; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Baez, 269 AD2d 392 [2000]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 75 to temporarily stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim to allow for discovery in aid of arbitration, the petitioner appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated May 22, 2006, which, inter alia, denied that branch of its motion which was to direct the respondent to provide all medical authorizations for the medical records and reports relative to the subject accident and two prior automobile accidents.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the petitioner’s motion which was to direct the respondent to provide all medical authorizations for the medical records and reports relating to the subject accident and two prior automobile accidents and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the appellant.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the petitioner’s motion which was to direct the respondent to provide all medical authorizations to obtain relevant medical reports and copies of relevant medical records pertaining to those bodily injuries that the respondent claims to have sustained as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident, including medical reports and medical records pertaining to bodily injuries sustained before the subject accident occurred which were similar to those allegedly sustained in the [599]*599subject accident (see CPLR 3102 [c]; Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Bautista, 11 AD3d 471 [2004]; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Moya, 288 AD2d 309 [2001]; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Baez, 269 AD2d 392 [2000]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.3d 598, 845 N.Y.S.2d 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-central-mutual-fire-insurance-v-serpico-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack