New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Mills

157 A.D. 932, 142 N.Y.S. 1132

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1913

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 157 A.D. 932 (New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Mills, 157 A.D. 932, 142 N.Y.S. 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Without any expression or intimation of opinion upon the merits of the controversy, we affirm the exercise of discretion by the Special Term in sending back the report to the commissioners by affirmance of the order, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Matter of Board of Water Commissioners, 55 App. Div. 77; Matter of Prospect Park & C. I. R. R. Co., 85 N. Y. 489.) Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Without any expression or intimation of opinion upon the merits of the controversy, we affirm the exercise of discretion by the Special Term in sending back the report to the commissioners by affirmance of the order, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Matter of Board of Water Commissioners, 55 App. Div. 77; Matter of Prospect Park & C. I. R. R. Co., 85 N. Y. 489.) Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 A.D. 932, 142 N.Y.S. 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-v-mills-nyappdiv-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack