New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. McConnell
239 U.S. 633, 36 S. Ct. 220, 60 L. Ed. 478, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1424
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U. S. 672, 677; New Orleans & N. E. R. R. v. National Rice Milling Co., 234 U. S. 80, 86; Mellon Co. v. McCafferty, 239 U. S., ante, p. 134.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. McConnell, 239 U.S. 633, 36 S. Ct. 220, 60 L. Ed. 478, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1424 (1915).
239 U.S. 633 (New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. McConnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Wood v. Chesborough
228 U.S. 672 (Supreme Court, 1913)
New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. National Rice Milling Co.
234 U.S. 80 (Supreme Court, 1914)