New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. E. C. Eby & Co.
9 Sadler 375
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 6, 1888·No. No. 181, E. D.·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The court below was asked to say to the jury that “under all the evidence of this case, the verdict must be for the defendant.” This it refused to do, and properly so; for there was positive evidence of the negligence of the company which could not lawfully be withdrawn from the consideration of the jury.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. E. C. Eby & Co., 9 Sadler 375 (Pa. 1888).
9 Sadler 375 (New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. E. C. Eby & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rhymer v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
27 Pa. Super. 345 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)