New York Bus Tours, Inc. v. Local 100, Transport Workers Union of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

New York Bus Tours, Inc. v. Local 100, Transport Workers Union of America

87 A.D.2d 786, 450 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16224

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 22, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A.D.2d 786 (New York Bus Tours, Inc. v. Local 100, Transport Workers Union of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York Bus Tours, Inc. v. Local 100, Transport Workers Union of America, 87 A.D.2d 786, 450 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16224 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (DiFede, J.), entered November 18, 1981 vacating an arbitration award entered June 5, 1981 on the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his power, and denying respondents-appellants’ cross motion to confirm the arbitration award, reversed, on the law, with costs, petition to vacate the arbitration award is dismissed, and cross motion to confirm is granted. From the facts set forth in the arbitrator’s opinion, it was an appropriate exercise of judgment for the arbitrator to conclude that the actions of the employee did not constitute a theft within the meaning of the arbitration provisions of the collective bargaining agreement. Accordingly, we do not agree with Special Term that the arbitrator, in making this determination, exceeded his power under CPLR 7511 (subd [b], par 1, cl [iii]). Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Bloom, Fein and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (DiFede, J.), entered November 18, 1981 vacating an arbitration award entered June 5, 1981 on the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his power, and denying respondents-appellants’ cross motion to confirm the arbitration award, reversed, on the law, with costs, petition to vacate the arbitration award is dismissed, and cross motion to confirm is granted. From the facts set forth in the arbitrator’s opinion, it was an appropriate exercise of judgment for the arbitrator to conclude that the actions of the employee did not constitute a theft within the meaning of the arbitration provisions of the collective bargaining agreement. Accordingly, we do not agree with Special Term that the arbitrator, in making this determination, exceeded his power under CPLR 7511 (subd [b], par 1, cl [iii]). Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Bloom, Fein and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 786, 450 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-bus-tours-inc-v-local-100-transport-workers-union-of-america-nyappdiv-1982.