New York Bus Operators Compensation Trust v. Network Adjusters, Inc.

2025 NY Slip Op 04579
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 6, 2025·No. Index No. 605540/20·Published

Opinion

New York Bus Operators Compensation Trust v Network Adjusters, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04579)

New York Bus Operators Compensation Trust v Network Adjusters, Inc.
2025 NY Slip Op 04579
Decided on August 6, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on August 6, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.
WILLIAM G. FORD
JANICE A. TAYLOR
LAURENCE L. LOVE, JJ.

2022-09390
(Index No. 605540/20)

[*1]New York Bus Operators Compensation Trust, appellant,

v

Network Adjusters, Inc., respondent.


Barbiero Bisch O'Connor & Commander LLP, Melville, NY (Anthony V. Barbiero of counsel), for appellant.

Morris Duffy Alonso Faley & Pitcoff, New York, NY (Robert S. Whitbeck, Iryna S. Krauchanka, and Kevin G. Faley of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Elizabeth H. Emerson, J.), dated October 12, 2022. The order granted the defendant's motion to preclude the plaintiff from introducing the expert testimony of a certain witness.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court's determination granting the defendant's motion to preclude the plaintiff from introducing the expert testimony of a certain witness constituted an evidentiary ruling (see Thornhill v Degen, 185 AD3d 982, 983). "Such a ruling, even when made in advance of trial on motion papers, constitutes, at best, an advisory opinion, which is not appealable, either as of right or by permission" (id. [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Washington v Todd, 210 AD3d 822, 822-823; Diller v Munzer, 141 AD3d 630, 630-631; Citlak v Nassau County Med. Ctr., 37 AD3d 640). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.

CHAMBERS, J.P., FORD, TAYLOR and LOVE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New York Bus Operators Compensation Trust v. Network Adjusters, Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 04579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

2025 NY Slip Op 04579 (New York Bus Operators Compensation Trust v. Network Adjusters, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diller Ex Rel. Trelles v. Munzer
141 A.D.3d 630 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Thornhill v. Degen
2020 NY Slip Op 4197 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Citlak v. Nassau County Medical Center
37 A.D.3d 640 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Washington v. Todd
210 A.D.3d 822 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)