New York Board of Fire Underwriters v. Moody

Second Circuit

New York Board of Fire Underwriters v. Moody

111 F. 1006, 49 C.C.A. 672, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4464

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 14, 1901

DocketNo. 16

StatusPublished

This text of 111 F. 1006 (New York Board of Fire Underwriters v. Moody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York Board of Fire Underwriters v. Moody, 111 F. 1006, 49 C.C.A. 672, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4464 (2d Cir. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We regard the assignments of error as so plainly without merit that no useful purpose would be subserved by discussing them seriatim. The case involves merely the application of the familiar rules of the law of negligence to the particular facts. It presented questions of fact for the jury upon, the issues of negligence on the part of the defendant and contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. These questions were submitted to the jury fully and plainly by the trial judge, and his instructions in respect to the legal propositions involved were adequate and accurate. We find no error in the record, and the judgment should therefore be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We regard the assignments of error as so plainly without merit that no useful purpose would be subserved by discussing them seriatim. The case involves merely the application of the familiar rules of the law of negligence to the particular facts. It presented questions of fact for the jury upon, the issues of negligence on the part of the defendant and contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. These questions were submitted to the jury fully and plainly by the trial judge, and his instructions in respect to the legal propositions involved were adequate and accurate. We find no error in the record, and the judgment should therefore be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 F. 1006, 49 C.C.A. 672, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-board-of-fire-underwriters-v-moody-ca2-1901.