New York Board of Fire Underwriters v. Boughan & Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

New York Board of Fire Underwriters v. Boughan & Co.

97 N.Y.S. 402

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 17, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 97 N.Y.S. 402 (New York Board of Fire Underwriters v. Boughan & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New York Board of Fire Underwriters v. Boughan & Co., 97 N.Y.S. 402 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The test of an account stated is that the minds of the parties met as to the amount due. It is clear that there was no such "meeting of minds here. The defendants’ letter of December 7, 1904, may well have been understood by plaintiff as stating that the organization represented by Boughan & Co. had assented to the account or bill presented by plaintiff; but the fact was otherwise. The defendant organizations had never agreed to the account as presented, but had approved the bills at a smaller sum. " To this smaller sum, however, the plaintiff had never assented, and does not now assent. Hence as to neither sum have the minds of the parties met.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The test of an account stated is that the minds of the parties met as to the amount due. It is clear that there was no such "meeting of minds here. The defendants’ letter of December 7, 1904, may well have been understood by plaintiff as stating that the organization represented by Boughan & Co. had assented to the account or bill presented by plaintiff; but the fact was otherwise. The defendant organizations had never agreed to the account as presented, but had approved the bills at a smaller sum. " To this smaller sum, however, the plaintiff had never assented, and does not now assent. Hence as to neither sum have the minds of the parties met.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 N.Y.S. 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-board-of-fire-underwriters-v-boughan-co-nyappterm-1906.