New York Bank Note Co. v. Hamilton Bank Note Engraving & Printing Co.

71 A.D. 611, 75 N.Y.S. 520

This text of 71 A.D. 611 (New York Bank Note Co. v. Hamilton Bank Note Engraving & Printing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York Bank Note Co. v. Hamilton Bank Note Engraving & Printing Co., 71 A.D. 611, 75 N.Y.S. 520 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Although we are of the opinion that the referee had no improper motives or purpose in his action, it is apparent that it was so indiscreet as to require the setting aside of the report and the appointment of a new referee. The order should, therefore-, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the action remitted to the court below for the appointment of a new referee. Present—Van Brunt, P. J., Ingra[612]*612ham, McLaughlin, Hatch and Laughlin, JJ. 'Ingraham, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 A.D. 611, 75 N.Y.S. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-bank-note-co-v-hamilton-bank-note-engraving-printing-co-nyappdiv-1902.