New York, B. & M. B. R. Co. v. Commissioner

3 B.T.A. 606, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2613
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedFebruary 8, 1926
DocketDocket No. 4945.
StatusPublished

This text of 3 B.T.A. 606 (New York, B. & M. B. R. Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York, B. & M. B. R. Co. v. Commissioner, 3 B.T.A. 606, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2613 (bta 1926).

Opinion

DECISION.

The deficiency should be computed by excluding from the taxpayer’s income the amount of the tax borne by the Director General .of Railroads. Appeal of New York, Ontario & Western Ry. Co., 1 B. T. A. 1172. Final determination will be settled' on 7 days’ notice, under Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appeal of New York, Brooklyn & Manhattan Beach Railway Co.
3 B.T.A. 606 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 B.T.A. 606, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-b-m-b-r-co-v-commissioner-bta-1926.