New York Architectural Terra Cotta Co. v. Eden

The Superior Court of New York City

New York Architectural Terra Cotta Co. v. Eden

52 N.Y. St. Rep. 942

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided May 9, 1893·Published

Opinion

Fitzsimons, J.

The testimony admitted establishes a sale, delivery and use-by defendant of the terra cotta mentioned in the order of defendant, dated 19th of July, 1889, by plaintiff to defendant.

It does not vary from the allegation of the complaint, and sustains the same; sufficient facts were presented by said testimony to warrant its submission to' the jury for consideration.

It was, therefore, error for the trial justice to dismiss the complaint.

Judgment reversed, a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event of action.

Ehrlich, Oh. J.. concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fitzsimons, J.

The testimony admitted establishes a sale, delivery and use-by defendant of the terra cotta mentioned in the order of defendant, dated 19th of July, 1889, by plaintiff to defendant.

It does not vary from the allegation of the complaint, and sustains the same; sufficient facts were presented by said testimony to warrant its submission to' the jury for consideration.

It was, therefore, error for the trial justice to dismiss the complaint.

Judgment reversed, a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event of action.

Ehrlich, Oh. J.. concurs.

New York Architectural Terra Cotta Co. v. Eden, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 942 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

52 N.Y. St. Rep. 942 (New York Architectural Terra Cotta Co. v. Eden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.