New York Annual Conference Ministers Mutual Assistance Society v. Executors of Clarkson

8 N.J. Eq. 541
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedMarch 15, 1851
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 N.J. Eq. 541 (New York Annual Conference Ministers Mutual Assistance Society v. Executors of Clarkson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York Annual Conference Ministers Mutual Assistance Society v. Executors of Clarkson, 8 N.J. Eq. 541 (N.J. Ct. App. 1851).

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The evidence shows, that the Methodist Episcopal Church in the United States is divided into Conferences, Districts, Circuits and Stations; that the Ministers having charge of churches must belong to a Conference, which meets annually, called an Annual Conference; that there are territorial boundaries to which the term Annual Conference is applied, as The New York Annual Conference; The New Jersey Annual Conference; that the words “ Annual Conference ” are used to designate the local division of the Church, and are also [544]*544used as meaning all the Preachers having charge of churches in 'that division of the Church. There is, then, in the Methodist '"Episcopal Church, a body known as The New York Conference. The will sufficiently describes this body as The New York Methodist Conference. As part of the corporate name of the complainants we have The New York Annual Conference.” This -is shown'by the evidence to be a body or division of the Methodist Episcopal Church. The words of the bequest sufficiently describe this New York Annual Conference.

The corporate name of the complainants denotes a Society of the Ministers of the New York Annual Conference for their mutual assistance. The words of the bequest denote a Society df the New York Methodist Conference, (that is of Ministers of thé New York ‘Methodist Conference,) for the support of Preachers.

Upon the evidence in the casej I have no doubt that the complainants are the legatees intended by the will.

Decree for complainants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mirinda v. King
78 A.2d 98 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 N.J. Eq. 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-annual-conference-ministers-mutual-assistance-society-v-executors-njch-1851.