New World Life Insurance v. United States
92 Ct. Cl. 612, 88 Ct. Cl. 405
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in New World Life Insurance v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 310 U.S. 654 →
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed upon the first ground set respect to investment expenses, the views expressed on the second question considered by the Court of Claims as to the [613]*613right of deduction on account of insurance reserves not being an essential basis for the judgment and being contrary to Helvering v. Oregon Mutual Life Insurance Company, No. 564, decided this day (311 U. S. 267).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New World Life Insurance v. United States, 92 Ct. Cl. 612, 88 Ct. Cl. 405 (U.S. 1940).
92 Ct. Cl. 612 (New World Life Insurance v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Helvering v. Oregon Mutual Life Insurance
311 U.S. 267 (Supreme Court, 1940)