New v. State

52 S.E. 160, 124 Ga. 143, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 674
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 10, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 S.E. 160 (New v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New v. State, 52 S.E. 160, 124 Ga. 143, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 674 (Ga. 1905).

Opinion

Pish, C. J.

The evidence against the accused was entirely circumstantial, and at most authorized a mere suspicion of his guilt; whereas to warrant a conviction the evidence should have been sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. The court, therefore, erred in refusing a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lindsey v. State
82 S.E. 378 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 S.E. 160, 124 Ga. 143, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-v-state-ga-1905.