New v. State

766 So. 2d 373, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9465, 2000 WL 1033051
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in New v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5716
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 28, 2000·No. No. 1D00-1522·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges an order denying his motion seeking post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse and remand for further consideration in light of the recent decisions in Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000) and Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000).

REVERSED AND REMANDED, with directions.

BARFIELD, C.J., DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ„ CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New v. State, 766 So. 2d 373, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9465, 2000 WL 1033051 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

766 So. 2d 373 (New v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trapp v. State
760 So. 2d 924 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)