New v. Fleming

75 F. App'x 292
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 17, 2003·No. 02-60712·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Randy Johnson appeals the denial of his motion for summary judgment in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Mississip *293 pi state law brought by the plaintiffs Jonathan P. New, Robert E. Stroupe, Michael P. Trouard, Scott M. Walle, and Brock L. Whitson. He argues that the district court erred by denying his summary judgment motion on the merits of his qualified immunity defense.

We must determine the basis of our jurisdiction, on our own motion, if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir.1987). “[Ojrders denying qualified immunity are immediately appealable only if they are predicated on conclusions of law, and not if a genuine issue of material fact precludes summary judgment on the question of qualified immunity.” Palmer v. Johnson, 193 F.3d 346, 351 (5th Cir.1999). Because genuine issues of material fact are disputed, precluding a determination that the appellant should enjoy qualified immunity, we lack jurisdiction to consider the instant appeal. The appeal is DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New v. Fleming, 75 F. App'x 292 (5th Cir. 2003).

75 F. App'x 292 (New v. Fleming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Palmer v. Johnson
193 F.3d 346 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
Marion Ray Mosley v. Officer M.D. Cozby
813 F.2d 659 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)