New v. Aland
62 How. Pr. 185
Opinion
—Held, First. That the order is appealable and the merits will be reviewed.
Second. That the order granted was erroneous and should [187]*187be modified so that the only right which the defendant shall have thereunder, shall be the right to serve the proposed amended answer set out in the appeal book, and as so modified, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, to be paid by the respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New v. Aland, 62 How. Pr. 185 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).
62 How. Pr. 185 (New v. Aland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rosenberg v. Feiering
124 A.D. 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
Callahan v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
99 A.D. 56 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
Gaylord v. Beardsley
19 N.Y.S. 548 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)