New Southern Ohio Gas Co. v. Roush

138 F.2d 411, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 2519
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 21, 1943·No. No. 9525·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and argument of counsel.

And it appearing that the referee’s finding of fact that the Roush lease had not been conveyed to the appellant company was confirmed by the District Court and should not be disturbed for anything less than a demonstration of plain mistake (Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Bridge, 6 Cir., [412]*41284 F.2d 660, 663; Bagley v. Rowley, 6 Cir., 127 F.2d 139, 140);

And it appearing that the record presents no evidence of any order of the bankruptcy court conveying to the appellant company any right, title or interest in the Roush lease, and hence the finding of fact is clearly correct:

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of the District Court dismissing the petition to review the order of the referee be, and it hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New Southern Ohio Gas Co. v. Roush, 138 F.2d 411, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 2519 (6th Cir. 1943).

138 F.2d 411 (New Southern Ohio Gas Co. v. Roush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cunningham v. Elco Distributors, Inc.
189 F.2d 87 (Sixth Circuit, 1951)