New Riegel Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn v. Buehrer Grp. Architecture & Eng., Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

New Riegel Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn v. Buehrer Grp. Architecture & Eng., Inc.

98 N.E.3d 293, 2018 Ohio 1990, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1478

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 23, 2018

Docket2018–0213

StatusPublished

This text of 98 N.E.3d 293 (New Riegel Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn v. Buehrer Grp. Architecture & Eng., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New Riegel Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn v. Buehrer Grp. Architecture & Eng., Inc., 98 N.E.3d 293, 2018 Ohio 1990, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1478 (Ohio 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

First, second, and third appeals accepted and appellant Charles Constr. Servs., Inc.'s motion to consolidate with 2018-189, New Riegel Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Buehrer Group Architecture & Eng., Inc. granted, and briefing in Nos. 2018-189 and 2018-0213 consolidated. The parties shall file two originals of each of the briefs permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. 16.02 through 16.04 and include both numbers on the cover pages of the briefs. The parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. 16.01 through 16.04.

O'Connor, C.J., and O'Donnell and DeWine, JJ., dissent in part and would accept the second appeal on proposition of law No. I only and accept the third appeal on proposition of law No. I only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

First, second, and third appeals accepted and appellant Charles Constr. Servs., Inc.'s motion to consolidate with 2018-189, New Riegel Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Buehrer Group Architecture & Eng., Inc. granted, and briefing in Nos. 2018-189 and 2018-0213 consolidated. The parties shall file two originals of each of the briefs permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. 16.02 through 16.04 and include both numbers on the cover pages of the briefs. The parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. 16.01 through 16.04.

O'Connor, C.J., and O'Donnell and DeWine, JJ., dissent in part and would accept the second appeal on proposition of law No. I only and accept the third appeal on proposition of law No. I only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 N.E.3d 293, 2018 Ohio 1990, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-riegel-local-sch-dist-bd-of-edn-v-buehrer-grp-architecture-eng-ohio-2018.