New Paltz, Highland & Poughkeepsie Traction Co. v. Central New England Railway Co.
This text of 163 A.D. 928 (New Paltz, Highland & Poughkeepsie Traction Co. v. Central New England Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order that the injunction granted by Justice Chester, pending the order to show cause before the Appellate Division, be continued until the action is tried and determined before Justice Chester; if the trial is delayed by the plain[929]*929tiff, the justice may modify or vacate the injunction. The justice may at any time, for any sufficient reason appearing to him, vacate or modify the stay before the conclusion of the trial. Smith, P. J., and Woodward, J., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 A.D. 928, 147 N.Y.S. 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-paltz-highland-poughkeepsie-traction-co-v-central-new-england-nyappdiv-1914.