New Orleans & Carrollton Rail Road v. Robert

9 Rob. 157
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedOctober 15, 1844
StatusPublished

This text of 9 Rob. 157 (New Orleans & Carrollton Rail Road v. Robert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New Orleans & Carrollton Rail Road v. Robert, 9 Rob. 157 (La. 1844).

Opinion

Morphy, J.

Joseph B. Robert has brought up this appeal from a judgment rendered against him as the endorser of a note drawn to his own order, held by the plaintiffs. The defence he made below, and upon which he insists in this court, is, that the notice to bind him as endorser is insufficient, as it was directed to him at the Holmesville post-office, when there was another post-office nearer to his residence, to-wit, that located at Bayou Rouge. .This defence is the same which was made in a suit between the same parties, decided a few days since, ante, p. 130, and rests on nearly the same evidence. It is clearly shown in this case, that although there may be a difference of about a mile in the distance of the two post-offices from the defendant’s residence, he is, and was at the time of the protest, in the habit of receiving his letters and papers at the Holmesville post-office. The notice given at that office appears to us sufficient. See the authorities cited in the case above referred to.

Judgment affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Rob. 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-orleans-carrollton-rail-road-v-robert-la-1844.