New Orleans Campaign For A Living Wage v. City of New Orleans

814 So. 2d 1273, 2002 La. LEXIS 1084, 2002 WL 548814
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 12, 2002·No. No. 2002-CD-0995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The application is granted. The execution of the trial court’s judgment declaring La. R.S. 23:642 unconstitutional and declaring Ordinance No. 20376, the Increased Minimum Wage Charter Amendment, to be valid is stayed pending further orders of this court. This court almost invariably grants such a stay in cases in which a single judge has declared a law or ordinance unconstitutional. Manuel v. State, 95-2156 (La.8/24/95), 695 So.2d 953; St. Charles Gaming Co. v. River Boat Gaming Commission, 645 So.2d 208 (La.1994); State v. Peart, 594 So.2d 1309 (La.1992); see Bowen v. Kendrick, 483 U.S. 1304, 108 S.Ct. 1, 97 L.Ed.2d 787 (1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New Orleans Campaign For A Living Wage v. City of New Orleans, 814 So. 2d 1273, 2002 La. LEXIS 1084, 2002 WL 548814 (La. 2002).

814 So. 2d 1273 (New Orleans Campaign For A Living Wage v. City of New Orleans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CAMPAIGN FOR a LIVING WAGE v. New Orleans
825 So. 2d 1098 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2002)