New Milford Savings Bank v. Mulville

786 A.2d 1090, 258 Conn. 802, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 516
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in New Milford Savings Bank v. Mulville. Read the opinion of the Court — 255 Conn. 922
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 25, 2001·No. SC 16445·Published

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this mortgage foreclosure action, we granted the petition of the defendants John D. Mulville, Jr., and Anne B. Mulville to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s judgment approving the foreclosure sale. New Milford Savings Bank v. Mulville, 60 Conn. App. 901, 759 A.2d 1058 (2000). After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, [804]*804we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.1

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New Milford Savings Bank v. Mulville, 786 A.2d 1090, 258 Conn. 802, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 516 (Colo. 2001).

786 A.2d 1090 (New Milford Savings Bank v. Mulville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Milford Savings Bank v. Mulville
763 A.2d 1041 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)
New Milford Savings Bank v. Mulville
759 A.2d 1058 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2000)