New Milford Savings Bank v. Mulville

786 A.2d 1090, 258 Conn. 802, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 516
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedDecember 25, 2001
DocketSC 16445
StatusPublished

This text of 786 A.2d 1090 (New Milford Savings Bank v. Mulville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New Milford Savings Bank v. Mulville, 786 A.2d 1090, 258 Conn. 802, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 516 (Colo. 2001).

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this mortgage foreclosure action, we granted the petition of the defendants John D. Mulville, Jr., and Anne B. Mulville to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s judgment approving the foreclosure sale. New Milford Savings Bank v. Mulville, 60 Conn. App. 901, 759 A.2d 1058 (2000). After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, [804]*804we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.1

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New Milford Savings Bank v. Mulville
763 A.2d 1041 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)
New Milford Savings Bank v. Mulville
759 A.2d 1058 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
786 A.2d 1090, 258 Conn. 802, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-milford-savings-bank-v-mulville-conn-2001.