New Milford Savings Bank v. Jajer

695 A.2d 540, 241 Conn. 906, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 282
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 29, 1997
DocketSC 15695
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 695 A.2d 540 (New Milford Savings Bank v. Jajer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New Milford Savings Bank v. Jajer, 695 A.2d 540, 241 Conn. 906, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 282 (Colo. 1997).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 588 (AC 14888), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to open the judgment of foreclosure based on General Statutes §§ 49-15 and 49-1?”

Kenneth J. Bartschi and Wesley W. Horton, in support of the petition. Seth Jacoby, in opposition. Decided May 29, 1997

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New Milford Savings Bank v. Jajer
708 A.2d 1378 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
695 A.2d 540, 241 Conn. 906, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-milford-savings-bank-v-jajer-conn-1997.