New Mexico v. Texas

Supreme Court

New Mexico v. Texas

264 U.S. 574, 44 S. Ct. 404, 68 L. Ed. 856, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2564

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 14, 1924

DocketNo. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 264 U.S. 574 (New Mexico v. Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New Mexico v. Texas, 264 U.S. 574, 44 S. Ct. 404, 68 L. Ed. 856, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2564 (1924).

Pincite

Opinion

In Equity.

Motion of the State of New Mexico to take additional testimony of the witness R. J. Owen granted, to be limited to' the subject matter detailed in his affidavits, [575]*575dated November 26, 1923, and filed with the motion, his examination and cross-examination to be completed within the month of May, with the right on the part of the State of Texas to introduce rebuttal to Owen’s testimony during the month of June. New Mexico to pay all the costs of the additional testimony, both that of Owen and of witnesses called in rebuttal to' his evidence.

Mr. Frank W. Clancy and Mr. W. R'. Reber for complainant. Mr. W. A. Keeling, Mr. W. W. Turney, and Mr. C. W. Taylor for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Equity.

Motion of the State of New Mexico to take additional testimony of the witness R. J. Owen granted, to be limited to' the subject matter detailed in his affidavits, [575]*575dated November 26, 1923, and filed with the motion, his examination and cross-examination to be completed within the month of May, with the right on the part of the State of Texas to introduce rebuttal to Owen’s testimony during the month of June. New Mexico to pay all the costs of the additional testimony, both that of Owen and of witnesses called in rebuttal to' his evidence.

Mr. Frank W. Clancy and Mr. W. R'. Reber for complainant. Mr. W. A. Keeling, Mr. W. W. Turney, and Mr. C. W. Taylor for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 U.S. 574, 44 S. Ct. 404, 68 L. Ed. 856, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-mexico-v-texas-scotus-1924.