New Mexico v. Texas

Supreme Court

New Mexico v. Texas

264 U.S. 574, 44 S. Ct. 404, 68 L. Ed. 856, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2564

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 14, 1924·No. No. 3·Published

Opinion

In Equity.

Motion of the State of New Mexico to take additional testimony of the witness R. J. Owen granted, to be limited to' the subject matter detailed in his affidavits, [575]*575dated November 26, 1923, and filed with the motion, his examination and cross-examination to be completed within the month of May, with the right on the part of the State of Texas to introduce rebuttal to Owen’s testimony during the month of June. New Mexico to pay all the costs of the additional testimony, both that of Owen and of witnesses called in rebuttal to' his evidence.

Mr. Frank W. Clancy and Mr. W. R'. Reber for complainant. Mr. W. A. Keeling, Mr. W. W. Turney, and Mr. C. W. Taylor for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Equity.

Motion of the State of New Mexico to take additional testimony of the witness R. J. Owen granted, to be limited to' the subject matter detailed in his affidavits, [575]*575dated November 26, 1923, and filed with the motion, his examination and cross-examination to be completed within the month of May, with the right on the part of the State of Texas to introduce rebuttal to Owen’s testimony during the month of June. New Mexico to pay all the costs of the additional testimony, both that of Owen and of witnesses called in rebuttal to' his evidence.

Mr. Frank W. Clancy and Mr. W. R'. Reber for complainant. Mr. W. A. Keeling, Mr. W. W. Turney, and Mr. C. W. Taylor for defendant.

New Mexico v. Texas, 264 U.S. 574, 44 S. Ct. 404, 68 L. Ed. 856, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2564 (1924).

Pincite

264 U.S. 574 (New Mexico v. Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.