New Life Evangelistic Center, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Dominion Broadcasting, Inc., Intervenor

895 F.2d 809, 282 U.S. App. D.C. 404, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2253
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 7, 1990
Docket89-1256
StatusUnpublished

This text of 895 F.2d 809 (New Life Evangelistic Center, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Dominion Broadcasting, Inc., Intervenor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New Life Evangelistic Center, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Dominion Broadcasting, Inc., Intervenor, 895 F.2d 809, 282 U.S. App. D.C. 404, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2253 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

Opinion

895 F.2d 809

282 U.S.App.D.C. 404

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
NEW LIFE EVANGELISTIC CENTER, INC., Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION,
Dominion Broadcasting, Inc., Intervenor.

No. 89-1256.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Feb. 7, 1990.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, and RUTH B. GINSBURG and STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the Federal Communications Commission and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. After full review, we are satisfied that appropriate disposition of the case does not warrant an opinion. See D.C.Cir.R. 14(c). We find no good cause to disturb the Commission's reasoned and adequately supported determinations that Dominion Broadcasting, Inc. was technically and financially qualified. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the decision from which this appeal has been taken be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.R. 15(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Davis (Dwight I.)
895 F.2d 809 (D.C. Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
895 F.2d 809, 282 U.S. App. D.C. 404, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-life-evangelistic-center-inc-v-federal-communications-commission-cadc-1990.