New Jersey v. Russo

384 U.S. 889, 86 S. Ct. 1914, 16 L. Ed. 2d 995, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1140
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 10, 1966·No. 834·Published·Cited by 30 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion of respondent Frank Bisignano for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is also granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for further proceedings in light of Johnson v. New Jersey, ante, p. 719.

Mr. Justice Douglas dissents for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Johnson v. New Jersey, ante, at 736.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New Jersey v. Russo, 384 U.S. 889, 86 S. Ct. 1914, 16 L. Ed. 2d 995, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1140 (1966).

384 U.S. 889 (New Jersey v. Russo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Nynex Corp.
788 F. Supp. 16 (District of Columbia, 1992)
State v. Manning
397 A.2d 686 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
United States ex rel. Russo v. New Jersey
438 F.2d 1343 (Third Circuit, 1971)
United States ex rel. Gockley v. Myers
314 F. Supp. 839 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1970)
Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, Jena
298 F. Supp. 1309 (S.D. New York, 1969)
United States v. Hughes
388 F.2d 236 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)