Home/Supreme Court/New Jersey v. New York

New Jersey v. New York

280 U.S. 533
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in New Jersey v. New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 283 U.S. 336 →
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 27, 1930·Published

Opinion

The motion for the appointment of a special master in this case is granted; and Charles N. Burch, Esquire* of Memphis, Tennessee, is appointed special master in this cause with, power to issue subpoenas' for witnesses and to take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem necessary. The master is directed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law, [534]*534and to submit the same to this Court with all convenient speed, together with his recommendations for a decree. The findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the special master shall be subject to consideration, rejection', revision, or approval by the Court.

Messrs. Duane E. Minará and Wm. A. Stevens for complainant. Messrs. Hamilton Ward, Thos. Penney, Jr., Paul Shipman Andrews, Arthur J. W. Hilly, J. Joseph Lilly, Frank J. Coyle, Frank H. Dial, and David C. Broderick for respondents:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New Jersey v. New York, 280 U.S. 533 (1930).

280 U.S. 533 (New Jersey v. New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.